mottobits.

Free tool · no email required

What’s behind your next release?

Ten questions about the evidence you have. Get clear gaps and three next actions. Your answers stay in this page.

Based only on your answers. No code inspection, external AI calls, or form submission.
QUESTION 01 / 10Is the release scope and expected behavior written down?

A bounded change, explicit acceptance criteria, and known exclusions.

QUESTION 02 / 10Have you identified the business workflows this change could disrupt?

Ranked workflows, roles, dependencies, and the consequence of failure.

QUESTION 03 / 10Can the team test this change in a controlled non-production environment?

A known application version, reproducible configuration, and restricted access.

QUESTION 04 / 10Is test data approved, repeatable, and safe to reset?

Synthetic or approved sanitized fixtures, with a reset plan and protection against unintended external side effects.

QUESTION 05 / 10Do repeatable checks assert the important business results?

Checks exercise the changed behavior and verify meaningful outcomes rather than only page availability.

QUESTION 06 / 10Have rejection, permission, and failure paths been checked?

Invalid input, unauthorized actions, and relevant dependency failures have documented expected outcomes.

QUESTION 07 / 10Can the checks run from a clean checkout with recorded results?

Commands and dependencies are documented, and instability is tracked rather than hidden by retries.

QUESTION 08 / 10Can someone explain a failed check or a failed release?

Useful logs, trace or correlation identifiers, and accessible failure evidence.

QUESTION 09 / 10Has recovery been rehearsed for both application and data changes?

A rollback or forward-recovery procedure, compatibility checks, and agreed stop conditions.

QUESTION 10 / 10Is a named person accountable for review and release acceptance?

A human owner reviews evidence, accepts remaining gaps, and owns the follow-up.